| Author | Sugita, Kurumi| |
|---|---|
| Published Date | 2010-03-26 |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Volume | volume8 |
| Content Type | Departmental Bulletin Paper |
| JaLCDOI | 10.18926/20311 |
| Author | Jürgens Ulrich| Lemke Björn| |
|---|---|
| Published Date | 2010-03-26 |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Volume | volume8 |
| Content Type | Departmental Bulletin Paper |
| JaLCDOI | 10.18926/20310 |
| Author | Dollat Patrick| |
|---|---|
| Published Date | 2010-03-26 |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Volume | volume8 |
| Content Type | Departmental Bulletin Paper |
| JaLCDOI | 10.18926/20309 |
| Author | Ota, Yoshiki| |
|---|---|
| Published Date | 2010-03-26 |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Volume | volume8 |
| Content Type | Departmental Bulletin Paper |
| JaLCDOI | 10.18926/20308 |
| JaLCDOI | 10.18926/20307 |
|---|---|
| Title Alternative | An Essay on Comparative Case Analyses in Management Studies (Part 2) |
| FullText URL | snae_008_001_020.pdf |
| Author | Fujii, Daiji| |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Published Date | 2010-03-26 |
| Volume | volume8 |
| Start Page | 1 |
| End Page | 20 |
| ISSN | 1880-8476 |
| language | Japanese |
| Copyright Holders | 岡山大学大学院社会文化科学研究科 |
| File Version | publisher |
| NAID | 120002310808 |
| Author | Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Okayama University| |
|---|---|
| Published Date | 2010-03-26 |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Volume | volume8 |
| Content Type | Others |
| Author | Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Okayama University| |
|---|---|
| Published Date | 2010-03-26 |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Volume | volume8 |
| Content Type | Others |
| Author | Yu, Lin| Nagahata, Hidekazu| |
|---|---|
| Published Date | 2009-03-26 |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Volume | volume7 |
| Issue | issue1 |
| Content Type | Departmental Bulletin Paper |
| JaLCDOI | 10.18926/15019 |
| Author | Meltem OKUR DINCSOY| |
|---|---|
| Published Date | 2009-03-26 |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Volume | volume7 |
| Issue | issue1 |
| Content Type | Departmental Bulletin Paper |
| JaLCDOI | 10.18926/15013 |
| Author | Nakamura, Ryohei| Recky H. E. Sendouw| |
|---|---|
| Published Date | 2009-03-26 |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Volume | volume7 |
| Issue | issue1 |
| Content Type | Departmental Bulletin Paper |
| JaLCDOI | 10.18926/15012 |
| Author | Zhang, Xingyuan| |
|---|---|
| Published Date | 2009-03-26 |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Volume | volume7 |
| Issue | issue1 |
| Content Type | Departmental Bulletin Paper |
| JaLCDOI | 10.18926/15011 |
| Author | Ishida, Satoko| |
|---|---|
| Published Date | 2007 |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Volume | volume6 |
| Issue | issue1 |
| Content Type | Departmental Bulletin Paper |
| JaLCDOI | 10.18926/13320 |
| JaLCDOI | 10.18926/13317 |
|---|---|
| Title Alternative | Regional Disparity Problem and Its Structure in the East Region of EU |
| FullText URL | 6_045_058.pdf |
| Author | Taguchi, Masahiro| |
| Abstract | 本稿は､EU東部地域の経済格差の現状をＥＵ中心部との比較､また国内における県別の比較を行い､その構造を明らかにするものである｡ 1997年 7月に欧州委員会は｢アジェンダ2000｣を発表した｡これによって､ポーランドを含む旧東欧 5カ国およびキプロスの先行加盟が準備され始める｡こうした動きに並行して､コソヴォ紛争の深刻化などに伴い､ＥＵは｢拡大によるＥＵの安定化｣志向を強めることとなる｡最終的には､2004年に10ヵ国､2007年に 2ヵ国が新規に加盟した｡ ＥＵ東方拡大は､全般的にはＥＵの政治的･経済的安定化に貢献したが､しかしながら､地域経済圏拡大はかならずしもクロスボーダーリージョンの安定化につながっているわけではない｡むしろ､ＥＵ拡大によって生じた摩擦や対立もある｡それは､現在ＥＵ内で急速に拡大志向の議論が萎み､｢拡大｣よりは｢深化｣に重点を置く議論が中心になりつつあることにも表れている｡もちろん､その背景には､｢拡大｣が経済圏･文明圏として重要な地域をほぼ包括しつつあること､ＥＵ周辺の政治的混乱が収まりつつあることなどがあるだろう｡しかしその一方で､拡大によって逆に多様性＝不安定要素を取り込んでしまい､その対応に多くの労力と資金がつぎ込まれて､拡大のメリットが十分に享受できないという｢拡大疲れ｣を伴った不満もある｡ 本稿では､経済格差､経済発達の遅れがどの程度のレベルにあるかを､ポーランドを中心に統計的に整理し､その構造を明らかにすることによって､クロスボーダーリージョン安定化を考える上でのひとつの材料としたい。 |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Published Date | 2008 |
| Volume | volume6 |
| Issue | issue1 |
| Start Page | 45 |
| End Page | 58 |
| ISSN | 1880-8476 |
| language | Japanese |
| File Version | publisher |
| NAID | 120002310248 120002310248 |
| JaLCDOI | 10.18926/13316 |
|---|---|
| FullText URL | 6_037_044.pdf |
| Author | Enomoto, Satoru| |
| Abstract | As everybody knows, China is growing very rapidly since the opening of the country in 1978.The real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of China in 2006 has more than 13 times larger than that of 1978. If we suppose the real GDP in 1978 is 100, then we can get 1335 in 2006. Also, the real growth rate of China is almost 10％ annually during the same period ( Ke,2006) and people in the world are amazed to know it. It is often said that the sum of China's GDP will surpass Japan's within a decade or less, if China continues to grow. With the continuation of the growth of Chinese economy, many companies in the world, especially US, European and Japanese companies have already gone into China either to produce goods for exporting back to home country or to foreign countries (export market-oriented) or to produce goods for Chinese domestic market (domestic market-oriented) or both, in any case, exploiting the use of inexpensive labor forces. In fact, foreign countries, of course the main actors are multinational corporations (MNCs) , have heavily invested in China. For example, the total accumulated amount of foreign direct investment (FDI, stock base) from Japan to the world has amounted to $449.6bn. in 2006, of which China has received $30.3bn. (6.3％) , the fourth rank, following the U.S. ($156.4bn., 34.8％) , Holland ($45.4bn., 10.1％) , and U.K. ($31.6bn., 7.0％) . Even on the flow basis, China has received $63.0bn. of inward investment in 2006, of which the most important investing country to China is Hong Kong, totaling $20.2 bn. in 2006, followed by UK-held Virgin Island ($11.2 bnJ ,the second rank, Japan ($4.6bnJ ,the third rank, South Korea ($3.9bnJ and the U. S. ($2.7bn) . (China Statistical Yearbook 2007; JETRO White Paper: Trade and Investment 2007) Based on the above-mentioned facts, we consider the competitive situations among companies from different countries in China. Do they compete head-to-head? Or, do they compete in another way? Through the executives' perception on competition, we try to deal with how they feel their competitive situation in China, based on a questionnaire survey which was sent to Japanese executives in charge of managing manufacturing subsidiaries in China during September to October in 2004 to investigate how subsidiary executives feel their competitive situation there and what kind of strategy they should pursue in the coming years. This paper comprises 4 sections. The next section shows how we collected companies' data, operating in China, and what kind of criteria we have employed to do the research and the basic features of responding companies. The third section deals with the perception of executives on how they perceive their conditions of Chinese market in relation to the competition with their competitors. And we also introduce Porter's Five forces model to investigate why they feel about their market. The final section argues that we have to consider how Japanese executives respond to the competitive situation. Hence, a managerial implication will be discussed from the standpoint of Japanese executives. |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Published Date | 2008 |
| Volume | volume6 |
| Issue | issue1 |
| Start Page | 37 |
| End Page | 44 |
| ISSN | 1880-8476 |
| language | English |
| File Version | publisher |
| NAID | 120002310523 |
| JaLCDOI | 10.18926/13315 |
|---|---|
| FullText URL | 6_021_036.pdf |
| Author | Huang Shaoan| Gao Wei| Zhang Su| Huang Naijing| |
| Abstract | This paper tries to measure the effect of cooperation on economic growth of both China and Japan by setting up an econometric model. This measuring is based on the basic framework of cooperation economics (Huang shao-an,2000) . The structure of the paper is as follows: The first part introduces the basic idea and analytical methods of cooperation economics; the second part establishes an econometric model for measuring the effect of cooperation on economic growth of both China and Japan; The third part measures degree of cooperation between China and Japan from two dimensions which are political factor and bilateral trade between China and Japan, and lists all the macroeconomic data that the econometric model needs; The fourth part employs the econometric model and the macroeconomic data to calculate the effect of cooperation on economic growth of both China and Japan; the final part is a brief conclusion. |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Published Date | 2008 |
| Volume | volume6 |
| Issue | issue1 |
| Start Page | 21 |
| End Page | 36 |
| ISSN | 1880-8476 |
| language | English |
| File Version | publisher |
| NAID | 120002310579 |
| JaLCDOI | 10.18926/13314 |
|---|---|
| Title Alternative | Current Progress Stage of the Chinese Economy and Its New Role in East Asian Economic Cooperation |
| FullText URL | 6_005_020.pdf |
| Author | Zhao, Wei| |
| Abstract | 東アジア経済協力を論ずる際に､中･日･韓三国の役割を忘れてはならない｡特に中国という要素を忘れてはならない｡また東アジア経済協力における中国という要素を論ずるに当たって､一つの現実的問題-すなわち､最近20年以上にわたる中国経済の非常に急速な成長-を見逃してはならない｡この中国の急速な成長は､積極的な対外開放戦略に大きく依存して実現されているからだ｡東アジア経済協力における中国の地位と役割には､大きな変化が生じつつある｡この点には疑問の余地はない｡これは近年東アジア経済界で関心が高まっている問題の一つでもある｡しかし､これまで上記の問題を論じる際には､学界･実業界･政界のいずれにあっても､誰もが例外なく中国経済を (人口や国土面積などの)外面的要素から判断しようとしたことに留意しなければならない｡言い換えれば､中国以外の東アジア経済と比較した中国経済の規模から始まり､その影響力､ひいては東アジア経済協力における新たな地位について､外面的要素から判断しようとしたのは留意すべきことである｡一つの経済の外部に対する影響力は､その経済の外的な規模に限られるわけではなく､内部の社会経済発展と変化によっても決定される｡この点を認識できなければ､例えば､人口も国土面積も中国の最も小さな省より小さいスイスという国の世界と地域に与える影響力が､多くの中進国よりも大きい､という事実を理解できないだろう｡ このような認識に基づき､筆者は本論文で中国経済の内的発展段階の分析を出発点に､中国経済の東アジア経済協力における新たな地位と展望について論じたい｡ |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Published Date | 2008 |
| Volume | volume6 |
| Issue | issue1 |
| Start Page | 5 |
| End Page | 20 |
| ISSN | 1880-8476 |
| language | Japanese |
| File Version | publisher |
| NAID | 120002310317 |
| JaLCDOI | 10.18926/13313 |
|---|---|
| FullText URL | 6_001_002.pdf |
| Author | Shimizu, koichi| |
| Publication Title | 北東アジア経済研究 |
| Published Date | 2008 |
| Volume | volume6 |
| Issue | issue1 |
| Start Page | 1 |
| End Page | 2 |
| ISSN | 1880-8476 |
| language | Japanese |
| File Version | publisher |
| NAID | 120002310441 |
