このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 61671
FullText URL
fulltext.pdf 1.89 MB
Author
Wada, Koichiro Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences ORCID researchmap
Araki, Motoo Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences ORCID Kaken ID publons researchmap
Tanimoto, Ryuta Department of Urology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital Kaken ID
Sadahira, Takuya Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Watari, Shogo Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Maruyama, Yuki Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Mitsui, Yosuke Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Nakajima, Hirochika Department of Urology, Fukuyama City Hospital
Acosta, Herik Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Katayama, Satoshi Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Iwata, Takehiro Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Kaken ID
Nishimura, Shingo Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Takamoto, Atsushi Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Sako, Tomoko Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Edamura, Kohei Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Kobayashi, Yasuyuki Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences ORCID Kaken ID
Watanabe, Masami Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Kaken ID publons researchmap
Watanabe, Toyohiko Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences ORCID Kaken ID publons researchmap
Nasu, Yasutomo Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Kaken ID publons researchmap
Abstract
Background The advantages of photodynamic diagnostic technology using 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA-PDD) have been established. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to evaluate the usefulness of ALA-PDD to diagnose upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UT-UC) using the Olympus VISERA ELITE video system. Methods We carried out a prospective, interventional, non-randomized, non-contrast and open label cohort pilot study that involved patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy (URS) to detect UT-UC. 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride was orally administered before URS. The observational results and pathological diagnosis with ALA-PDD and traditional white light methods were compared, and the proportion of positive subjects and specimens were calculated. Results A total of 20 patients were enrolled and one patient who had multiple bladder tumors did not undergo URS. Fifteen of 19 patients were pathologically diagnosed with UT-UC and of these 11 (73.3%) were ALA-PDD positive. Fourteen of 19 patients were ALA-PDD positive and of these 11 were pathologically diagnosed with UC. For the 92 biopsy specimens that were malignant or benign, the sensitivity for both traditional white light observation and ALA-PDD was the same at 62.5%, whereas the specificities were 73.1% and 67.3%, respectively. Of the 38 specimens that were randomly biopsied without any abnormality under examination by both white light and ALA-PDD, 11 specimens (28.9%) from 5 patients were diagnosed with high grade UC. In contrast, four specimens from 4 patients, which were negative in traditional white light observation but positive in ALA-PDD, were diagnosed with carcinoma in situ (CIS). Conclusions Our results suggest that ALA-PDD using VISERA ELITE is not sufficiently applicable for UT-UC. Nevertheless, it might be better particularly for CIS than white light and superior results would be obtained using VISERA ELITE II video system. Trial registration: The present clinical study was approved by the Okayama University Institutional Review Board prior to study initiation (Application no.: RIN 1803-002) and was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), Japan (Accession no.: UMIN000031205).
Keywords
Photodynamic diagnosis
5-Aminolevulinic acid
ALA-PDD
Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
VISERA ELITE video system
Published Date
2021-03-25
Publication Title
BMC urology
Volume
volume21
Issue
issue1
Publisher
BMC
Start Page
45
ISSN
1471-2490
NCID
AA12035460
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© The Author(s) 2021.
File Version
publisher
PubMed ID
NAID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00819-2
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/