Rectal Swab–based Targeted Prophylactic Antibiotics Reduce Infectious Complications After Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background and objective: Transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy is the recommended approach in guidelines, while transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB) is still widely used to diagnose prostate cancer (PCa); however, it is associated with a significant rate of infectious complications. We aimed to assess the efficacy of targeted prophylactic antibiotics (TPAs), based on rectal swabs, in reducing the incidence of infectious complications after TRUS-PB compared with empiric prophylactic antibiotics.
Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were queried in December 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing infectious complications between patients who received TPAs based on rectal swab culture before TRUS-PB and those who received empiric prophylactic antibiotics before TRUS-PB (PROSPERO: CRD42024523794). The primary outcomes were the incidence rates of febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI) and sepsis.
Key findings and limitations: Overall, nine RCTs (n = 3002) were included in our analyses. The incidence of fUTI was approximately half as high in patients who received TPAs as in those who received empiric prophylactic antibiotics (n = 3002, 2.7% vs 5.2%, risk ratio [RR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36–0.81, p = 0.003). Based on these pooled incidence rates, the number of patients needed to treat to prevent fUTI after TRUS-PB was 40; however, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of sepsis between patients receiving TPAs and those who received empiric antibiotic prophylaxis (n = 2735, 1.3% vs 1.8%, RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.31–1.75, p = 0.4).
Conclusions and clinical implications: TPAs based on rectal swab culture significantly reduces the incidence of fUTI in patients who undergo TRUS-PB for PCa diagnosis compared with that in patients who receive empiric prophylactic antibiotics; however, there is insufficient evidence to assess its effect on the risk of sepsis. We recommend, based on the clinically relevant reduction in the incidence of fUTI, performing rectal swab–based TPAs in patients undergoing TRUS-PB.
Patient summary: We reviewed infections occurring after transrectal prostate biopsy in over 3000 patients. The use of antibiotics chosen based on a simple rectal swab decreased the rate of postbiopsy fever and urinary tract infections by half compared with the use of standard antibiotics. More research is needed to understand whether this approach also prevents the rare but serious complication of sepsis.