ID | 65648 |
FullText URL | |
Author |
Ninomiya, Kiichiro
Center for Comprehensive Genomic Medicine, Okayama University Hospital
Kaken ID
Inoue, Daisuke
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Fukui
Sugimoto, Ken
Department of General Geriatric Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School
Tanaka, Chie
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
Murofushi, Keiko
Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital
Okuyama, Toru
Department of Psychiatry / Palliative Care Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center
Watanuki, Shigeaki
National Center for Global Health and Medicine, National College of Nursing
Imamura, Chiyo K.
Advanced Cancer Translational Research Institute, Showa University
Sakai, Daisuke
Department of Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine
Sakurai, Naomi
Cancer Solutions Co.,Ltd
Watanabe, Kiyotaka
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Teikyo University
Tamura, Kazuo
NPO Clinical Hematology/Oncology Treatment Study Group
Saeki, Toshiaki
Breast Oncology Service, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center
Ishiguro, Hiroshi
Breast Oncology Service, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center
|
Abstract | Introduction: The number of older patients with cancer is expected to continue to increase owing to the aging population. Recently, the usefulness of geriatric assessment (GA) conducted by multiple staff members from different medical backgrounds has been reported; however, a consensus on the effectiveness of GA has not yet been achieved.
Materials and Methods: We, as the Japanese Geriatric Oncology Guideline Committee for elderly patients with cancer, conducted a literature search of randomized controlled trials published before August 2021 that used GA or comprehensive GA (CGA) as an intervention for patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. As the key outcomes for answering the clinical question, we focused on survival benefit, adverse events, and quality of life (QOL). After a systematic review of these studies, the expert panel member developed recommendations according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results: For older patients with cancer, GA or CGA is suggested during or before chemotherapy (weakly recommended). Chemotherapy-induced adverse events were significantly reduced by GA/CGA interventions without any adverse effects on survival. Health-related QOL tended to improve with the GA/CGA interventions. Discussion: Although, in our opinion, GA/CGA does require time and resources, it poses no harm patients. Therefore, we suggest expanding the human resources and educating skills of medical providers for clinical implementation of GA/CGA. |
Keywords | Comprehensive geriatric assessment
Guideline
Systematic review
|
Published Date | 2023-06-11
|
Publication Title |
Journal of Geriatric Oncology
|
Volume | volume14
|
Issue | issue5
|
Publisher | Elsevier
|
Start Page | 101485
|
ISSN | 18794068
|
Content Type |
Journal Article
|
language |
English
|
OAI-PMH Set |
岡山大学
|
Copyright Holders | © 2023 The Authors.
|
File Version | publisher
|
PubMed ID | |
DOI | |
Web of Science KeyUT | |
Related Url | isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101485
|
License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
|