このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加


ID 69161
FullText URL
fulltext.pdf 2.11 MB
Author
Higashihara, Naohiro Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Furumatsu, Takayuki Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Kaken ID publons
Okazaki, Yuki Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Yokoyama, Yusuke Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Tamura, Masanori Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Kawada, Koki Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Hasegawa, Tsubasa Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Kohara, Toshiki Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Ozaki, Toshifumi Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Kaken ID publons researchmap
Abstract
Purpose Medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (PRT) can lead to excessive knee loading and unsatisfactory clinical outcomes after non-operative treatment or meniscectomy. Although favourable clinical outcomes after MM posterior root (PR) repair have been reported, no study has specifically investigated the outcomes of different types of MMPRT. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with complete radial and oblique MMPRT following MMPR repair.
Methods Forty patients who had undergone MMPR repair were retrospectively investigated. Patients with type 2 (20 knees) and 4 MMPRT (20 knees) were included in this study. The MMPRT type was classified according to the LaPrade classification. Plain radiographs, magnetic resonance images, arthroscopic findings, and pre- and postoperative clinical outcomes were evaluated.
Results At 1 year postoperatively, clinical outcomes notably improved in patients with type 2 and 4 MMPRT. No significant differences were observed in any of the evaluations between these patients, both before and after the surgery.
Conclusion Patients with type 2 and type 4 MMPRT exhibited significantly improved clinical outcomes. MMPR repair is beneficial in treating type 2 and type 4 MMPRT.
Level of evidence IV
Keywords
Clinical outcomes
Medial meniscus
Oblique tear
Posterior root tear
Pullout repair
Radial tear
Note
The version of record of this article, first published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, is available online at Publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04137-9
Published Date
2024-11-28
Publication Title
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
Volume
volume35
Issue
issue1
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Start Page
30
ISSN
1432-1068
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© The Author(s) 2024
File Version
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04137-9
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Citation
Higashihara, N., Furumatsu, T., Okazaki, Y. et al. Transtibial pullout repair improved short-term clinical outcomes in patients with oblique medial meniscus posterior root tear comparable to radial root tear. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 35, 30 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04137-9
助成情報
( 国立大学法人岡山大学 / Okayama University )