このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加


ID 57368
JaLCDOI
FullText URL
73_5_387.pdf 1.94 MB
Author
Inoue, Miyabi Miyabi Urogyne Clinic
Yokoyama, Teruhiko Yokoyama Urological Clinic
Abstract
To assess the efficacy and safety of 2 drugs for overactive bladder (OAB), solifenacin and mirabegron. Fortyseven female OAB patients were randomized into 2 groups. Twenty-three patients were initially prescribed solifenacin for 4 weeks, followed by mirabegron for 4 weeks (group S). The other 24 patients were initially prescribed mirabegron for 4 weeks, followed by solifenacin for 4 weeks (group M). Evaluations included clinical determination of the OAB symptom score (OABSS), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and Visual Analog Scale. The IPSS significantly improved after the administration of solifenacin in both groups. The OABSS significantly improved in both groups after 4 weeks. In group M, the OABSS after eight weeks was significantly improved compared to that after 4 weeks. However, in group S, it was not significantly improved. Twelve patients experienced adverse events during the solifenacin treatment, while 2 patients experienced adverse events during the mirabegron treatment. Both solifenacin and mirabegron led to improved OAB symptoms. Switching from mirabegron to solifenacin significantly improved the OABSS. However, mirabegron led to fewer adverse events than solifenacin. We recommend that mirabegron be prescribed first for OAB patients. If patients are not satisfied with mirabegron, solifenacin should be used.
Keywords
overactive bladder,
randomized crossover study
solifenacin
mirabegron
Amo Type
Original Article
Publication Title
Acta Medica Okayama
Published Date
2019-10
Volume
volume73
Issue
issue5
Publisher
Okayama University Medical School
Start Page
387
End Page
392
ISSN
0386-300X
NCID
AA00508441
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
Copyright Holders
CopyrightⒸ 2019 by Okayama University Medical School
File Version
publisher
Refereed
True
PubMed ID
Web of Science KeyUT