このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加


ID 68704
FullText URL
Author
Hori, Tomoki Department of Pharmacy, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center
Yamamoto, Kazuhiro Department of Integrated Clinical and Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University
Nakagawa, Tomoaki Department of Pharmacy, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center
Nakagawa, Rinako Department of Pharmacy, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center
Okayama, Masami Department of Pharmacy, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center
Sudou, Tamika Department of Pharmacy, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center
Hamasaki, Moe Department of Pharmacy, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center
Yasuda, Mai Department of Pharmacy, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center
Kobayashi, Shinya Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center
Nakamura, Fumihiko Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center
Yagi, Hideo Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center
Kitahiro, Yumi Department of Pharmacy, Kobe University Hospital
Ikushima, Shigeki Department of Pharmacy, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center
Yano, Ikuko Department of Pharmacy, Kobe University Hospital
Abstract
Purpose Infusion-related reaction (IRR) is a common adverse event induced by rituximab. Although first-generation histamine 1 receptor antagonists (H1RAs) are commonly used to prevent IRR, evidence on IRR suppression by the second-generation H1RA bepotastine is scarce. In this study, we assessed the inhibitory effects of bepotastine on rituximab-induced IRR and compared them with those of the first-generation H1RA diphenhydramine.
Methods We retrospectively evaluated IRR incidence in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma who received their first dose of rituximab.
Results The incidence of any grade IRR was 9.8% in the bepotastine group (n = 92), which was significantly lower than the 30.2% rate in the diphenhydramine group (n = 96; p < 0.001). The incidence of grade 2 or higher IRR was similar between the two groups (6.5% vs. 12.5%; p = 0.16). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk of any grade IRR incidence was higher in patients with B symptoms and bulky disease. Premedication with bepotastine was an independent factor in reducing the risk of any grade IRR incidence (odds ratio = 0.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.08–0.47).
Conclusion Bepotastine may be more effective than diphenhydramine in reducing the incidence of rituximab-induced IRR, particularly low-grade reactions.
Keywords
Rituximab
Infusion reaction
Bepotastine
Diphenhydramine
Note
The version of record of this article, first published in International Journal of Hematology, is available online at Publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12185-025-03990-6
Published Date
2025-04-29
Publication Title
International Journal of Hematology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
ISSN
0925-5710
NCID
AA10797094
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© The Author(s) 2025
File Version
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-025-03990-6
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Citation
Hori, T., Yamamoto, K., Nakagawa, T. et al. Comparative inhibitory effects of bepotastine and diphenhydramine on rituximab-induced infusion reactions. Int J Hematol (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-025-03990-6
Funder Name
Okayama University