このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 69205
FullText URL
Author
Hisamatsu, Takashi Department of Public Health, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Fukuda, Mari Department of Public Health, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Kinuta, Minako Department of Public Health, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Kanda, Hideyuki Department of Public Health, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Kaken ID researchmap
Abstract
Aims: Artificial intelligence is increasingly used in the medical field. We assessed the accuracy and reproducibility of responses by ChatGPT to clinical questions (CQs) in the Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for Prevention Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2022 (JAS Guidelines 2022).
Methods: In June 2024, we assessed responses by ChatGPT (version 3.5) to CQs, including background questions (BQs) and foreground questions (FQs). Accuracy was assessed independently by three researchers using six-point Likert scales ranging from 1 (“completely incorrect”) to 6 (“completely correct”) by evaluating responses to CQs in Japanese or translated into English. For reproducibility assessment, responses to each CQ asked five times separately in a new chat were scored using six-point Likert scales, and Fleiss kappa coefficients were calculated.
Results: The median (25th–75th percentile) score for ChatGPT’s responses to BQs and FQs was 4 (3–5) and 5 (5–6) for Japanese CQs and 5 (3–6) and 6 (5–6) for English CQs, respectively. Response scores were higher for FQs than those for BQs (P values <0.001 for Japanese and English). Similar response accuracy levels were observed between Japanese and English CQs (P value 0.139 for BQs and 0.586 for FQs). Kappa coefficients for reproducibility were 0.76 for BQs and 0.90 for FQs.
Conclusions: ChatGPT showed high accuracy and reproducibility in responding to JAS Guidelines 2022 CQs, especially FQs. While ChatGPT primarily reflects existing guidelines, its strength could lie in rapidly organizing and presenting relevant information, thus supporting instant and more efficient guideline interpretation and aiding in medical decision-making.
Keywords
Autonomic intelligence
ChatGPT
Accuracy
Reproducibility
Guidelines
Published Date
2025-05-01
Publication Title
Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis
Volume
volume32
Issue
issue5
Publisher
Japan Atherosclerosis Society
Start Page
567
End Page
579
ISSN
1340-3478
NCID
AA11018976
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© 2025 Japan Atherosclerosis Society
File Version
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.65240
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/