このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 65984
FullText URL
fulltext.pdf 6.47 MB
Author
TAKAGI, KOSEI Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
KUMANO, KENJIRO Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
UMEDA, YUZO Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
YOSHIDA, RYUICHI Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
FUJI, TOMOKAZU Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
YASUI, KAZUYA Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
YAGI, TAKAHITO Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
FUJIWARA, TOSHIYOSHI Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Abstract
Background/Aim: Understanding different surgical approaches and anatomical landmarks adjacent to the splenic artery (SpA) is important for safe robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP). Herein, we propose our standardized RDP techniques, focusing on these issues. Patients and Methods: Between April 2021 and April 2022, 19 patients who underwent RDP at our Institution were reviewed. Anatomical patterns of the SpA were classified into three types: Type 1, no pancreatic parenchyma on the root of the SpA; type 2, any pancreatic parenchyma on the root of the SpA; and type 3, dorsal pancreatic artery around the bifurcation of the common hepatic artery and SpA. Next, the surgical strategy for approaching the SPA was determined according to the location of the pancreatic transection line: On the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) or on the left side of the root of the SpA. Results: There were seven cases of type 1, nine cases of type 2, and three cases of type 3. When transecting the pancreas on the SMV, the SpA-first ligation technique was used for type 1 SpA anatomy, and the pancreas-first division technique was applied for types 2 and 3. In patients in whom the pancreas was transected at the left side of the root of the SpA, the SpA-first ligation technique was used. Conclusion: Our standardized surgical strategy based on anatomical landmarks and focusing on the approach to the SpA in RDP is demonstrated. Our strategy should help trainees approach the SpA and perform RDP safely.
Keywords
Robot
distal pancreatectomy
surgical approach
splenic artery
pancreatic cancer
Published Date
2022-08-23
Publication Title
Anticancer Research
Volume
volume42
Issue
issue9
Publisher
Anticancer Research USA Inc.
Start Page
4471
End Page
4476
ISSN
0250-7005
NCID
AA10625860
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios)
File Version
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.15947
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Funder Name
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
助成番号
21K16447