このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 62192
FullText URL
Author
Mitsui, Takashi Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Mishima, Sakurako Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Ohira, Akiko Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Tani, Kazumasa Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Maki, Jota Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences ORCID Kaken ID researchmap
Eto, Eriko Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences ORCID Kaken ID researchmap
Hayata, Kei Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Masuyama, Hisashi Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Kaken ID publons researchmap
Abstract
Objective: To retrospectively investigate cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) patients who received systemic methotrexate (MTX) and to clarify the criteria for administering systemic MTX to CSP patients.
Materials and methods: Fifteen CSP patients who were initially treated with systemic MTX (50 mg/m2/ week) were included. Nine patients, who needed a uterine artery embolization (UAE) or a laparotomy, including a transabdominal hysterectomy (TAH), were defined as the unsuccessful MTX group. Six patients who did not require UAE or a laparotomy were defined as the successful MTX group. Furthermore, the hCG cut-off value and the GS cut-off size at the time of CSP diagnosis, which differentiated successful and unsuccessful patients, were defined. MTX success rates were investigated by combining the hCG and gestational sac (GS) size cut-off values.
Results: The hCG cut-off value was 17757.0 mIU/mL, and the GS cut-off size was 10.4 mm. In patients with hCG values less than 17757.0 mIU/mL, the MTX success rate was 75.0%. Fewer patients needed UAE or a laparotomy compared to patients with hCG values higher than 17757.0 mIU/mL (P = 0.007). In patients with a GS size less than 10.4 mm, the MTX success rate was 80.0%. Fewer patients among them needed UAE or a laparotomy compared to those among patients with a GS size greater than 10.4 mm (P = 0.089). In patients with hCG values and GS sizes lower than the cut-off values, the MTX success rate was 80.0%. Fewer patients among them needed UAE or a laparotomy compared to those among patients with hCG values and/or GS sizes higher than the cut-off values, respectively (P = 0.010).
Conclusion: Patients with hCG values less than 17757.0 mIU/mL and GS sizes less than 10.4 mm may have a greater chance of successful systemic MTX treatment when it is used as the first line of treatment for CSP.
Keywords
Cesarean scar pregnancy
Gestational sac
Human chorionic gonadotropin
Systemic methotrexate
Published Date
2021-05
Publication Title
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume
volume60
Issue
issue3
Publisher
ELSEVIER TAIWAN
Start Page
454
End Page
457
ISSN
1028-4559
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© 2021 Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology.
File Version
publisher
PubMed ID
NAID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2021.03.011
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Funder Name
society of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Chugoku and Shikoku area