このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 63939
FullText URL
Author
Nishimura, Takeshi Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Suga, Masafumi Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Nakao, Atsunori Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Kaken ID
Ishihara, Satoshi Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hyogo Emergency Medical Center
Naito, Hiromichi Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences ORCID Kaken ID publons
Abstract
Aim: Survival of traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is poor. Early use of advanced airway management (AAM) tech niques, including endotracheal intubation and supraglottic devices, are expected to contribute to the improved survival of these patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether prehospital use of AAM improves the outcomes for emergency medical service (EMS)-witnessed traumatic OHCA. Methods: A nationwide retrospective study was carried out. Trauma patients with EMS-witnessed cardiac arrest who received car diopulmonary resuscitation during transport were included. Patients younger than 16 years and those with missing data were excluded. We compared two groups using propensity score matching. The primary outcome was survival to discharge. The secondary outcome was return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) on hospital arrival. A logistic regression model was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI). Results: After propensity score matching, 1,346 patients were enrolled (AAM 673 versus non-AAM 673). Forty-four AAM cases (6.5%) and 39 non-AAM cases (5.8%) survived. Logistic regression analysis did not show a contribution of AAM for survival to discharge (AAM 44/673 (6.5%), non-AAM 39/673 (5.8%); OR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.70-1.76; P = 0.64). However, AAM improved ROSC on admission (AAM 141/673 (21.0%), non-AAM 77/673 (11.4%); OR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.51-2.78; P < 0.001). This tendency was consistent throughout our subgroup analysis categorized by body region of the severe injury (head trauma, torso trauma, and extremity/spine trauma). Conclusions: Prehospital AAM among EMS-witnessed traumatic OHCA patients was not associated with survival to discharge; however, ROSC on hospital admission improved for the AAM patients.
Keywords
AAM
Endotracheal intubation
JTDB
supraglottic airway
traumatic cardiac arrest
Published Date
2022-09-16
Publication Title
Acute Medicine & Surgery
Volume
volume9
Issue
issue1
Publisher
Wiley
Start Page
e786
ISSN
2052-8817
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© 2022 The Authors.
File Version
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1002/ams2.786
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/