このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 30550
JaLCDOI
FullText URL
Author
Shigenobu, Masaharu
Suzuki, Yoshihide
Sato, Junichi
Sadakane, Shoji
Maeda, Naotoshi
Yamamoto, Mitsuo
Kurahara, Hideki
Teramoto, Shigeru
Abstract

In the aortic stenosis group, the left ventricular (LV) muscle mass index was a good parameter for predicting the prognosis. Associated mitral valve disease had no influence on long term survival after aortic valve replacement. In the aortic insufficiency group, associated mitral valve disease had a marked influence on the results of aortic valve replacement. In general, the aortic insufficiency group had less clinical improvement postoperatively than the aortic stenosis group. In the annuloaortic ectasia group, left ventricular enddiastolic pressure (LVEDP) might be the predictor to the prognosis. This group had the worst prognosis, of the three groups. Early operation should be considered for patients who have no, or only mild symptoms of, aortic valve disease.

Keywords
aortic valve replacement
late survival predictor
aoetic stenosis
aortic insufficiency
annuloaortic ectasia.
Amo Type
Article
Publication Title
Acta Medica Okayama
Published Date
1980-06
Volume
volume34
Issue
issue3
Publisher
Okayama University Medical School
Start Page
189
End Page
196
ISSN
0386-300X
NCID
AA00508441
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
File Version
publisher
Refereed
True
PubMed ID
Web of Science KeyUT