このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 66983
FullText URL
fulltext.pdf 3.77 MB
Author
Nakata, Noa Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Okayama University
Okamoto, Ryuichi Graduate School of Information Science, University of Hyogo
Sumi, Tomonari Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Okayama University ORCID Kaken ID publons researchmap
Koga, Kenichiro Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Okayama University ORCID Kaken ID publons researchmap
Morita, Takeshi Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Chiba University
Imamura, Hiroshi Department of Bio-Science, Nagahama Institute of Bio-Science and Technology
Abstract
Alcohols and urea are widely used as effective protein denaturants. Among monohydric alcohols, 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE) has large cosolvent effects as a helix stabilizer in proteins. In contrast, urea efficiently denatures ordered native structures, including helices, into coils. These opposing cosolvent effects of TFE and urea are well known, even though both preferentially bind to proteins; however, the underlying molecular mechanism remains controversial. Cosolvent-dependent relative stability between native and denatured states is rigorously related to the difference in preferential binding parameters (PBPs) between these states. In this study, GCN4-p1 with two-stranded coiled coil helices was employed as a model protein, and molecular dynamics simulations for the helix dimer and isolated coil were conducted in aqueous solutions with 2 M TFE and urea. As 2 M cosolvent aqueous solutions did not exhibit clustering of cosolvent molecules, we were able to directly investigate the molecular origin of the excess PBP without considering the enhancement effect of PBPs arising from the concentration fluctuations. The calculated excess PBPs of TFE for the helices and those of urea for the coils were consistent with experimentally observed stabilization of helix by TFE and that of coil by urea. The former was caused by electrostatic interactions between TFE and side chains of the helices, while the latter was attributed to both electrostatic and dispersion interactions between urea and the main chains. Unexpectedly, reverse-micelle-like orientations of TFE molecules strengthened the electrostatic interactions between TFE and the side chains, resulting in strengthening of TFE solvation.
Keywords
2,2,2-trifluoroethanol
cosolvent effects
preferential binding parameter
protein folding stability
urea
Published Date
2023-09-25
Publication Title
Protein Science
Volume
volume32
Issue
issue10
Publisher
Wiley
Start Page
e4763
ISSN
0961-8368
NCID
AA10829011
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© 2023 The Authors.
File Version
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.4763
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Citation
Nakata N, Okamoto R, Sumi T, Koga K, Morita T, Imamura H. Molecular mechanism of the common and opposing cosolvent effects of fluorinated alcohol and urea on a coiled coil protein. Protein Science. 2023; 32(10):e4763. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.4763
Funder Name
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
助成番号
JP20K05431
JP22H01888
JP21K06503