このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加


ID 67952
フルテキストURL
著者
Toyosawa, Junki Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital
Yamasaki, Yasushi Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital ORCID Kaken ID publons
Aoyama, Yuki Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital
Takei, Kensuke Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital
Igawa, Shoko Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital
Inokuchi, Toshihiro Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital
Kinugasa, Hideaki Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital ORCID Kaken ID
Takahara, Masahiro Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital
Hiraoka, Sakiko Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital Kaken ID publons researchmap
Okada, Hiroyuki Department of Internal Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital Kaken ID publons researchmap
Otsuka, Motoyuki Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital
抄録
Introduction: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) have been developed recently, in addition to conventional methods, but adverse events of each method have not been fully clarified. We compared the outcomes of each method for the appropriate choice. Methods: Patients who underwent CSP, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)/hot snare polypectomy (HSP), or UEMR for small and intermediate-sized colorectal polyps between April 2017 and June 2020 were retrospectively examined. The rate of adverse events and recurrences due to each method were determined as the main outcomes. Clinical factors related to adverse events were examined. Results: A total of 1,025 patients with 3,163 polyps underwent polypectomy using any of the methods. CSP, EMR/HSP, and UEMR were performed for 704 (22.2%), 2,145 (67.8%), and 314 polyps (9.9%), and the median size for each method was 4, 6, and 7 mm, respectively. Delayed bleeding for CSP, EMR/HSP, and UEMR was 0%, 0.2%, and 0.6% (p = 0.15), and perforation was 0%, 0.1%, and 0%, respectively (p = 0.62). Recurrence after CSP, EMR/HSP, and UEMR was 0.3%, 0.09%, and 1.3%, respectively (p < 0.01). Recurrence for UEMR was significantly higher in the early stage of procedure introduction (p = 0.015). Oral anticoagulants were the risk factor for delayed bleeding (p < 0.01, respectively). Conclusion: There was no significant difference regarding adverse events among each method for small and intermediate-sized polyps, although the recurrence rate after UEMR was higher than other methods.
キーワード
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Cold snare polypectomy
備考
This is the accepted manuscript version of an article published by Karger Publishers in [Junki Toyosawa, Yasushi Yamasaki, Yuki Aoyama, Kensuke Takei, Shoko Igawa, Toshihiro Inokuchi, Hideaki Kinugasa, Masahiro Takahara, Sakiko Hiraoka, Hiroyuki Okada, Motoyuki Otsuka; Adverse Events after Different Endoscopic Resection Procedures for Small and Intermediate-Sized Colorectal Polyps. Dig Dis 2 December 2024; 42 (6): 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1159/000540365] and available on karger.com/Article/FullText/doi.
発行日
2024-08-09
出版物タイトル
Digestive Diseases
42巻
6号
出版者
S. Karger AG
開始ページ
529
終了ページ
537
ISSN
0257-2753
NCID
AA10725752
資料タイプ
学術雑誌論文
言語
英語
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
著作権者
© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel
論文のバージョン
author
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
関連URL
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1159/000540365
Citation
Junki Toyosawa, Yasushi Yamasaki, Yuki Aoyama, Kensuke Takei, Shoko Igawa, Toshihiro Inokuchi, Hideaki Kinugasa, Masahiro Takahara, Sakiko Hiraoka, Hiroyuki Okada, Motoyuki Otsuka; Adverse Events after Different Endoscopic Resection Procedures for Small and Intermediate-Sized Colorectal Polyps. Dig Dis 2 December 2024; 42 (6): 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1159/000540365