ID | 67952 |
フルテキストURL | |
著者 |
Toyosawa, Junki
Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital
Yamasaki, Yasushi
Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital
ORCID
Kaken ID
publons
Aoyama, Yuki
Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital
Takei, Kensuke
Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital
Igawa, Shoko
Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital
Inokuchi, Toshihiro
Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital
Takahara, Masahiro
Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital
Hiraoka, Sakiko
Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital
Kaken ID
publons
researchmap
Okada, Hiroyuki
Department of Internal Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital
Kaken ID
publons
researchmap
Otsuka, Motoyuki
Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital
|
抄録 | Introduction: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) have been developed recently, in addition to conventional methods, but adverse events of each method have not been fully clarified. We compared the outcomes of each method for the appropriate choice. Methods: Patients who underwent CSP, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)/hot snare polypectomy (HSP), or UEMR for small and intermediate-sized colorectal polyps between April 2017 and June 2020 were retrospectively examined. The rate of adverse events and recurrences due to each method were determined as the main outcomes. Clinical factors related to adverse events were examined. Results: A total of 1,025 patients with 3,163 polyps underwent polypectomy using any of the methods. CSP, EMR/HSP, and UEMR were performed for 704 (22.2%), 2,145 (67.8%), and 314 polyps (9.9%), and the median size for each method was 4, 6, and 7 mm, respectively. Delayed bleeding for CSP, EMR/HSP, and UEMR was 0%, 0.2%, and 0.6% (p = 0.15), and perforation was 0%, 0.1%, and 0%, respectively (p = 0.62). Recurrence after CSP, EMR/HSP, and UEMR was 0.3%, 0.09%, and 1.3%, respectively (p < 0.01). Recurrence for UEMR was significantly higher in the early stage of procedure introduction (p = 0.015). Oral anticoagulants were the risk factor for delayed bleeding (p < 0.01, respectively). Conclusion: There was no significant difference regarding adverse events among each method for small and intermediate-sized polyps, although the recurrence rate after UEMR was higher than other methods.
|
キーワード | Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Cold snare polypectomy
|
備考 | This is the accepted manuscript version of an article published by Karger Publishers in [Junki Toyosawa, Yasushi Yamasaki, Yuki Aoyama, Kensuke Takei, Shoko Igawa, Toshihiro Inokuchi, Hideaki Kinugasa, Masahiro Takahara, Sakiko Hiraoka, Hiroyuki Okada, Motoyuki Otsuka; Adverse Events after Different Endoscopic Resection Procedures for Small and Intermediate-Sized Colorectal Polyps. Dig Dis 2 December 2024; 42 (6): 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1159/000540365] and available on karger.com/Article/FullText/doi.
|
発行日 | 2024-08-09
|
出版物タイトル |
Digestive Diseases
|
巻 | 42巻
|
号 | 6号
|
出版者 | S. Karger AG
|
開始ページ | 529
|
終了ページ | 537
|
ISSN | 0257-2753
|
NCID | AA10725752
|
資料タイプ |
学術雑誌論文
|
言語 |
英語
|
OAI-PMH Set |
岡山大学
|
著作権者 | © 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel
|
論文のバージョン | author
|
PubMed ID | |
DOI | |
Web of Science KeyUT | |
関連URL | isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1159/000540365
|
Citation | Junki Toyosawa, Yasushi Yamasaki, Yuki Aoyama, Kensuke Takei, Shoko Igawa, Toshihiro Inokuchi, Hideaki Kinugasa, Masahiro Takahara, Sakiko Hiraoka, Hiroyuki Okada, Motoyuki Otsuka; Adverse Events after Different Endoscopic Resection Procedures for Small and Intermediate-Sized Colorectal Polyps. Dig Dis 2 December 2024; 42 (6): 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1159/000540365
|