
| ID | 69426 |
| フルテキストURL |
suppl.docx
934 KB
|
| 著者 |
Yanagisawa, Takafumi
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine
Matsukawa, Akihiro
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna
Mori, Keiichiro
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine
Kawada, Tatsushi
Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Katayama, Satoshi
Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Rajwa, Paweł
Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna
Quhal, Fahad
Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna
Pradere, Benjamin
Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna
Moschini, Marco
Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna
Miki, Jun
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine
Kimura, Takahiro
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine
|
| 抄録 | Context: Several phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown the importance of perioperative systemic therapy, especially for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
Objective: To synthesize the growing evidence on the efficacy and safety of systemic therapies for MIBC utilizing the data from RCTs. Evidence acquisition: Three databases and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched in October 2024 for eligible RCTs evaluating oncologic outcomes in MIBC patients treated with systemic therapy. We evaluated pathological complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Evidence synthesis: Thirty-three RCTs (including 14 ongoing trials) were included in this systematic review. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved OS compared to radical cystectomy alone. Particularly, the VESPER trial demonstrated that dd-MVAC provided oncological benefits over GC alone in terms of pCR rates, OS (HR: 0.71), and PFS (HR: 0.70). Recently, the NIAGARA trial showed that perioperative durvalumab plus GC outperformed GC alone in terms of pCR rates, OS (HR: 0.75), and EFS (HR: 0.68). Despite the lack of data on overall AE rates in the VESPER trial, differential safety profiles in hematologic toxicity were reported between dd-MVAC and durvalumab plus GC regimens. In the adjuvant setting, no study provided the OS benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. However, only adjuvant nivolumab had significant DFS and OS benefits compared to placebo. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains the current standard of care for MIBC. Durvalumab shed light on the promising impact of ICIs added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nivolumab is the only ICI recommended as adjuvant therapy in patients who harbored adverse pathologic outcomes. Ongoing trials will provide further information on the impact of combination therapy, including chemotherapy, ICIs, and enfortumab vedotin, in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. |
| キーワード | immune checkpoint inhibitors
chemotherapy
urothelial carcinoma
muscle-invasive
neoadjuvant
adjuvant
|
| 発行日 | 2025-03
|
| 出版物タイトル |
Bladder Cancer
|
| 巻 | 11巻
|
| 号 | 2号
|
| 出版者 | SAGE Publications
|
| 開始ページ | 1
|
| 終了ページ | 13
|
| ISSN | 2352-3727
|
| 資料タイプ |
学術雑誌論文
|
| 言語 |
英語
|
| OAI-PMH Set |
岡山大学
|
| 著作権者 | © The Author(s) 2025
|
| 論文のバージョン | publisher
|
| PubMed ID | |
| DOI | |
| Web of Science KeyUT | |
| 関連URL | isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1177/23523735251335122
|
| ライセンス | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
|
| Citation | Yanagisawa T, Matsukawa A, Teoh JY-C, et al. Advancements in systemic therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review from the beginning to the latest updates. Bladder Cancer. 2025;11(2). doi:10.1177/23523735251335122
|