このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加


ID 69794
フルテキストURL
著者
Ogura, Takeshi Pancreatobiliary Advanced Medical Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital
Kuroda, Taira Gastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Hospital
Matsuura, Takanori Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine
Kitadai, Jun Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine
Kitagawa, Koh Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University
Itonaga, Masahiro Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University
Takeshita, Kotaro Department of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital
Matsumori, Tomoaki Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine
Emori, Tomoya Department of Gastroenterology, Wakayama Rosai Hospital
Takenaka, Mamoru Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Sciences
Imai, Hajime Department of Gastroenterology, Okanami General Hospital
Mandai, Koichiro Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital
Shintani, Shuhei Department of Gastroenterology, Shiga University of Medical Science
Fujimori, Nao Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University
Shiomi, Hideyuki Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Gastroenterology, Hyogo Medical University
Asada, Masanori Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Japanese Red Cross Osaka Hospital
Sagami, Ryota Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University
Maruyama, Hirotsugu Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University
Ikeura, Tsukasa Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University Hospital
Shimatani, Masaaki Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University Medical Center
Nishikiori, Hidefumi Department of Gastroenterology, Oita San-ai Medical Center
Matsumoto, Kazuyuki Department of Endoscopy, Okayama University Hospital ORCID Kaken ID publons
Kokubu, Masahito Department of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine
Kamada, Hideki Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University
Ishida, Yusuke Department of Gastroenterology and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University
Hakoda, Akitoshi 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University
Kitano, Masayuki Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University
抄録
Objective: Percutaneous transhepatic liver abscess drainage (PTAD) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver abscess drainage (EUS-LAD) have several limitations. Recently, because of technical improvements in echoendoscope maneuvers, EUS-guided access for the right hepatic lobe has been reported. The aim of this multicenter, retrospective study was to compare clinical outcomes of PTAD and EUS-LAD including the right hepatic lobe in West Japan.
Method: This retrospective, multicenter study included consecutive patients with liver abscesses between January 2019 and November 2024. The primary outcome in this study was the clinical success rate compared between EUS-LAD and PTAD.
Results: During the study period, 1012 consecutive patients developed liver abscesses. Of them, 734 patients were excluded, 43 underwent EUS-LAD and 235 patients underwent PTAD. After propensity score-matched analysis, the clinical success rate was significantly higher in the EUS-LAD group (97.7%, 42/43) than in the PTAD group (79.1%, 34/43) (p = 0.007). After a propensity score-matched analysis, 25 patients were included in each group. The clinical success rate was significantly higher in the EUS-LAD group (100%, 25/25) than in the PTAD group (84%, 21/25) (p = 0.037). Adverse events were also significantly higher in the PTAD group (16%, 5/25) than in the EUS-LAD group (p = 0.025). In addition, the median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the EUS-LAD group (15 days) than in the PTAD group (22 days) (p = 0.005).
Conclusions: EUS-LAD using a metal stent might be one of the options, but further randomized, controlled trials are needed.
キーワード
drainage
endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver abscess drainage
EUS
liver abscess
percutaneous transhepatic liver abscess drainage
発行日
2025-11-27
出版物タイトル
Digestive Endoscopy
出版者
Wiley
ISSN
0915-5635
NCID
AA10907137
資料タイプ
学術雑誌論文
言語
英語
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
著作権者
© 2025 The Author(s).
論文のバージョン
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
関連URL
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1111/den.70067
ライセンス
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Citation
T. Ogura, T. Kuroda, T. Matsuura, et al., “ EUS-Guided Versus Percutaneous Transhepatic Drainage of Liver Abscesses: A Multicenter Endohepatology Study in Western Japan (EPIC-LA Study),” Digestive Endoscopy (2025): 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1111/den.70067.