ID | 67517 |
フルテキストURL | |
著者 |
Ebisudani, Yuki
Department of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Sugiu, Kenji
Department of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
ORCID
Kaken ID
publons
researchmap
Murai, Satoshi
Department of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Haruma, Jun
Department of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
ORCID
Kaken ID
researchmap
Hiramatsu, Masafumi
Department of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Hishikawa, Tomohito
Department of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Kaken ID
publons
researchmap
Date, Isao
Department of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
ORCID
Kaken ID
publons
researchmap
|
抄録 | Objective: Simulation training has focused on education and practical training. However, the adoption rate of neurointerventional simulation training in Japan is unknown. Therefore, we sent a questionnaire survey form to consulting specialists from the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy (JSNET) to clarify the actual simulation training situation and compare the differences between university hospitals and general hospitals in Japan.
Methods: The questionnaire survey was conducted in 243 neurosurgical training facilities that had JSNET consulting specialists between May 31, 2021 and July 31, 2021. The questionnaire survey forms were distributed by Google Forms. Results: A total of 162 facilities responded to the survey (response rate: 66.7%; 35.2% from university hospitals and 64.8% from general hospitals). The adoption rate for simulation training was 53.7%, and it was significantly higher in the university hospitals than in the general hospitals (64.9% vs. 47.6%, p = 0.035). On the simulation effectiveness survey, more than 80% of respondents answered that the simulation training was a useful tool for upskill training. The open-ended question on interventional simulation training showed that there are limiting factors such as financial constraints. Additionally, respondents expressed a desire for a standard neurointerventional simulation training and education program. Conclusion: The adoption rate for simulation training was 53.7% in the training facilities of JSNET, and it was higher in the university hospitals than in the general hospitals. Most of the respondents answered that simulation training is an effective tool to improve neurointerventional skills. They also requested the establishment of simulation training programs and simulation tools. |
キーワード | neurointervention
simulation training
questionnaire survey
|
発行日 | 2023
|
出版物タイトル |
Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy
|
巻 | 17巻
|
号 | 9号
|
出版者 | The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
|
開始ページ | 181
|
終了ページ | 187
|
ISSN | 1882-4072
|
NCID | AA1229439X
|
資料タイプ |
学術雑誌論文
|
言語 |
英語
|
OAI-PMH Set |
岡山大学
|
著作権者 | © 2023 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
|
論文のバージョン | publisher
|
PubMed ID | |
DOI | |
Web of Science KeyUT | |
関連URL | isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.ra.2022-0062
|
ライセンス | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
|