このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 69956
フルテキストURL
著者
Manabe, Yohei Department of Pharmacy, Okayama University Hospital
Hagiya, Hideharu Department of Infectious Diseases, Okayama University Hospital ORCID Kaken ID researchmap
Fukushima, Shinnosuke Department of Infectious Diseases, Okayama University Hospital
Nakamoto, Kenta Department of Infectious Diseases, Okayama University Hospital
Oguni, Kohei Department of Infectious Diseases, Okayama University Hospital
Akazawa, Hidemasa Department of Infectious Diseases, Okayama University Hospital
Fujita, Yasushi Department of Nursing, Okayama University Hospital
Kiguchi, Takashi Department of Nursing, Okayama University Hospital
Iio, Koji Microbiology Division, Clinical Laboratory, Okayama University Hospital
抄録
Background: Blood culture remains the gold standard for diagnosing bacteremia; however, contamination inevitably occurs in 2-3% of cases, requiring differentiation between true bacteremia and contamination. Although time to positivity (TTP) aids in this clinical decision, with detection after 24 hours generally indicating contamination, technological advances in blood culture systems may have shortened this threshold interval.
Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed blood culture data in our hospital from April 2023 to January 2025 to determine the optimal TTP cutoff. Patients with positive blood cultures for major contaminating bacteria were included. Cases were classified as true bacteremia or contamination based on a comprehensive chart review conducted by the antimicrobial stewardship audit, and TTP was compared between the groups. Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden index at various TTP cutoffs were utilized to determine the optimal threshold using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Results: Seventy-one patients were enrolled, with 34 cases classified as true bacteremia and 37 as contamination. Identified bacteria included coagulase-negative staphylococci (70.4%), viridans group streptococci (18.3%), and others (11.3%). The median TTP was significantly shorter in the true bacteremia group compared with the contamination group (18.6 vs.25.8 hours, p < 0.001). In the contamination group, 43.2% of the cases demonstrated positive growth within 24 hours. Based on sensitivity, specificity, and Youden index, the optimal threshold was estimated to be 20 hours. A subgroup analysis of the CNS-only cohort yielded concordant results.
Conclusion: This study suggests that a 20-hour TTP threshold could help effectively differentiate true bacteremia from contamination in current clinical settings.
キーワード
Bacteremia
Blood stream infection
Contamination
Incubation time
Time to positivity
発行日
2025-12
出版物タイトル
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
113巻
4号
出版者
Elsevier BV
開始ページ
117030
ISSN
0732-8893
NCID
AA10623322
資料タイプ
学術雑誌論文
言語
英語
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
著作権者
© 2025 The Author(s).
論文のバージョン
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
関連URL
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.117030
ライセンス
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/