このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 65703
フルテキストURL
fulltext.pdf 1020 KB
著者
Naito, Hiromichi Department of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Sakuraya, Masaaki Department of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, JA Hiroshima General Hospital
Hongo, Takashi Department of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Takada, Hiroaki Department of Critical Care Medicine and Trauma, National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center
Yumoto, Tetsuya Department of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences ORCID Kaken ID publons
Yorifuji, Takashi Department of Epidemiology, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Science ORCID Kaken ID publons researchmap
Hifumi, Toru Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Luke’s International Hospital
Inoue, Akihiko Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hyogo Emergency Medical Center
Sakamoto, Tetsuya Department of Emergency Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine
Kuroda, Yasuhiro Department of Emergency, Disaster, and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University
Nakao, Atsunori Department of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Kaken ID
SAVE-J II Study Group
抄録
Background Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is rapidly becoming a common treatment strategy for patients with refractory cardiac arrest. Despite its benefits, ECPR raises a variety of ethical concerns when the treatment is discontinued. There is little information about the decision to withhold/withdraw life-sustaining therapy (WLST) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients after ECPR.
Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the SAVE-J II study, a retrospective, multicenter study of ECPR in Japan. Adult patients who underwent ECPR for OHCA with medical causes were included. The prevalence, reasons, and timing of WLST decisions were recorded. Outcomes of patients with or without WLST decisions were compared. Further, factors associated with WLST decisions were examined.
Results We included 1660 patients in the analysis; 510 (30.7%) had WLST decisions. The number of WLST decisions was the highest on the first day and WSLT decisions were made a median of two days after ICU admission. Reasons for WLST were perceived unfavorable neurological prognosis (300/510 [58.8%]), perceived unfavorable cardiac/pulmonary prognosis (105/510 [20.5%]), inability to maintain extracorporeal cardiopulmonary support (71/510 [13.9%]), complications (10/510 [1.9%]), exacerbation of comorbidity before cardiac arrest (7/510 [1.3%]), and others. Patients with WLST had lower 30-day survival (WLST vs. no-WLST: 36/506 [7.1%] vs. 386/1140 [33.8%], p < 0.001). Primary cerebral disorders as cause of cardiac arrest and higher severity of illness at intensive care unit admission were associated with WLST decisions.
ConclusionFor approximately one-third of ECPR/OHCA patients, WLST was decided during admission, mainly because of perceived unfavorable neurological prognoses. Decisions and neurological assessments for ECPR/OHCA patients need further analysis.
キーワード
Clinical decision-making
Treatment limitation
Futility
Post-cardiac arrest syndrome
ECPR
備考
The version of record of this article, first published in Critical Care, is available online at Publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04534-2
発行日
2023-06-27
出版物タイトル
Critical Care
27巻
1号
出版者
BMC
開始ページ
252
ISSN
1364-8535
資料タイプ
学術雑誌論文
言語
英語
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
著作権者
© The Author(s) 2023.
論文のバージョン
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
関連URL
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04534-2
ライセンス
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Citation
Naito, H., Sakuraya, M., Hongo, T. et al. Prevalence, reasons, and timing of decisions to withhold/withdraw life-sustaining therapy for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care 27, 252 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04534-2