ID | 50694 |
フルテキストURL | |
著者 |
Tsutsumi, Koichiro
Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol
ORCID
Kaken ID
researchmap
Kawamoto, Hirofumi
Kawasaki Med Univ, Dept Gen Internal Med 2
Hirao, Ken
Hiroshima City Hosp, Dept Internal Med
Sakakihara, Ichiro
Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol
Yamamoto, Naoki
Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol
Noma, Yasuhiro
Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol
Fujii, Masakuni
Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol
Kato, Hironari
Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol
ORCID
Kaken ID
researchmap
Ogawa, Tsuneyoshi
Hiroshima City Hosp, Dept Internal Med
Ishida, Etsuji
Kurashiki Cent Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol
Kuwaki, Kenji
Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol
Kaken ID
Nouso, Kazuhiro
Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol
ORCID
Kaken ID
publons
researchmap
Okada, Hiroyuki
Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol
|
抄録 | Background: Measurement of objective response to chemotherapy using imaging modalities is sometimes difficult in pancreatic cancer (PC). We aimed to verify whether monitoring of serum tumor markers (TMs), namely carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9, DUPAN-2, SPan-1, can facilitate earlier confirmation of treatment failure.
Methods: Monitoring of serum TMs and computed tomography were performed every 4 weeks until progression of disease in 90 patients with PC undergoing gemcitabine therapy. In Group A (January 2006 October 2007), we analyzed the fluctuation rates of TMs with high pretreatment positive rates, and defined the criteria of progressive disease under TM monitoring (TM-PD). In Group B (November 2007 October 2008), we calculated the time to progression (TTP) under this TM-PD criteria, which was compared with the UP under the RECIST criteria.
Results: CA19-9 and SPan-1 had the highest pretreatment positive rates: 83% and 90%, respectively. In Group A (CA19-9, n = 38; SPan-1, n = 36), TM-PD criteria were defined as follows: fluctuation rates were >25% for a month or >= 10% for 2 consecutive months in CA19-9, and >= 10% for a month in SPan-1. In Group B (CA19-9, n = 18; SPan-1, n = 17), under these criteria, one-month earlier confirmation of treatment failure was feasible in 61% by CA19-9 and 59% by SPan-1. Furthermore, the combination could facilitate this determination in 72% (35/49), significantly better than CA19-9 alone (P = 0.004).
Conclusion: Monitoring of serum CA19-9 and Span-1 is helpful for earlier confirmation of treatment failure during gemcitabine therapy in PC.
|
キーワード | Pancreas
Pancreatic cancer
Tumor marker
Gemcitabine
Diagnosis
|
発行日 | 2012-09
|
出版物タイトル |
Pancreatology
|
巻 | 12巻
|
号 | 5号
|
出版者 | Karger
|
開始ページ | 409
|
終了ページ | 416
|
ISSN | 1424-3903
|
資料タイプ |
学術雑誌論文
|
オフィシャル URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2012.07.009
|
関連URL | http://ousar.lib.okayama-u.ac.jp/metadata/50663
|
言語 |
英語
|
著作権者 | Copyright (C) 2012, IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier India, a division of Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
論文のバージョン | author
|
査読 |
有り
|
DOI | |
Web of Science KeyUT |