このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 68642
フルテキストURL
fulltext.pdf 1.53 MB
著者
Takagi, Kosei Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine ORCID publons
Fuji, Tomokazu Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine
Yasui, Kazuya Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine
Umeda, Yuzo Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine Kaken ID researchmap
Yamada, Motohiko Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine
Nishiyama, Takeyoshi Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine
Nagai, Yasuo Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine
Kanehira, Noriyuki Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine
Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine ORCID Kaken ID publons researchmap
抄録
Background Internationally, evidence supporting robotic liver resection (RLR) has gradually increased in recent years. However, a standardized protocol for RLR remains lacking. This study describes a surgical protocol and the initial outcomes of RLR in a high-volume center for robotic hepatopancreatobiliary surgery in Japan.
Methods Patients were placed in the reverse Trendelenburg position, with a supine position for anterolateral tumors and left lateral position for posterosuperior tumors. Our standard RLR protocol involved a two-surgeon technique. Liver parenchymal transection was performed by an assistant using the clamp crush technique with a console, with or without a laparoscopic Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA). Surgical techniques, including the tips, tricks, and pitfalls of RLR, are also demonstrated.
Results We performed 113 RLR at our institution for common primary diseases, including hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 52, 46.0%) and metastatic tumors (n = 48, 42.5%) between July 2022 and December 2024. The median operative time and estimated blood loss were 156 min (interquartile range [IQR], 121-209 min) and 20 mL (IQR, 0-100 mL), respectively. During liver parenchymal transection, a laparoscopic CUSA was used in 59 patients (52.2%), and a water-jet scalpel was used in 12 patients (10.6%). The incidence of mortality, major complications, and bile leakage was 0%, 6.2%, and 2.7%, respectively. The median hospital stay was 7 days (IQR, 6-9 days).
Conclusions We successfully introduced an RLR program using the two-surgeon technique. Safe implementation of RLR can be achieved upon completion of the training program and thorough understanding of the surgical protocols.
キーワード
Liver resection
Robotic surgery
Training
Outcomes
発行日
2025-04-07
出版物タイトル
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
23巻
1号
出版者
BMC
開始ページ
124
ISSN
1477-7819
資料タイプ
学術雑誌論文
言語
英語
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
著作権者
© The Author(s) 2025.
論文のバージョン
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
関連URL
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03785-3
ライセンス
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Citation
Takagi, K., Fuji, T., Yasui, K. et al. Surgical protocol of robotic liver resection using a two-surgeon technique (TAKUMI-3): a technical note and initial outcomes. World J Surg Onc 23, 124 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03785-3