start-ver=1.4 cd-journal=joma no-vol=84 cd-vols= no-issue=1 article-no= start-page=37 end-page=45 dt-received= dt-revised= dt-accepted= dt-pub-year=1995 dt-pub=19950201 dt-online= en-article= kn-article= en-subject= kn-subject= en-title=THe Overall Framework of the Intentions of Farm households towards Farm Management and Urban Development in the City Suburbs-A Case Study of kn-title=地方都市近郊農家の農業経営・地域整備意向の構造-広島市安佐南区伴・大塚地区の事例から- en-subtitle= kn-subtitle= en-abstract=本論は、地方中核都市である広島市の近郊農村地域を対象として、農家の地域整備意向の構造を明らかにした。最後に本論の統計的分析で得られた知見を総括する。@当該地域における農業経営・地域整備に関する農家意向調査の単純集計結果からは、都市近郊に特有な農家意識、つまり、農地の財産的保有意識と地域環境保全の志向が確認された。Aかかる意向データに数量化理論V類を適用して、その意識構造を明らかにした。その結果、都市近郊農家の農業経営・地域整備意向は、意向の保留・明示軸（第1軸）、都市開発・農地保全軸（第2軸）、農業経営に対する積極性・消極性軸（第3軸）の3次元により構成されていることが判明した。B第1軸VS第2軸および第1軸VS第3軸のカテゴリースコアの分布を検討したところ、保留カテゴリーの挙動は第2軸、第3軸の意味と矛盾しないことが明らかになった。この点は、信頼性があまり大きくない第2、第3軸の意義を補強するものと理解できる。C地区別、生産別のスコア平均値を図示し、空間的な特徴を検討したところ、立地条件（都市的開発のインパクト）との対応関係が推察された。ただし、この点についてはさらに踏み込んだ検討が積み重ねられる必要がある。D上記A、Bの結果を踏まえて、第2軸と第3軸の組み合わせによる農家意向の総合的類型を設定し、各類型別の地域整備課題を大まかに指摘した。ここで試みられた意向類型区分は暫定的なものであるが、地区毎にきめ細かい地域整備方針を作成する上で、有効な判断資料になると考えられる。E第1軸の意味からも明らかなように、意向を保留している農家がかなり存在している。このような農家の意向を行政がどのように啓蒙・誘導していくかが、今後の地域整備推進の一つの鍵となろう。 kn-abstract=The authors were concerned with the preparation of the rural improvement plan for years in the administrative district "Asaminami-ku of Hiroshima City from 1988 years.In that process,we got the opportunity that questionnaire investigation about agriculture management and urban development was carried out toward all the farm households(FHHs) in the case area.The technique of the quantification theory type "V" was applied to the data of the questionnaire investigation.In this paper,we made clear the structural characteristics and the areal defferentation of the intension of FHHs.It is also discussed in detail about the characteristics of the " No answer" categories.After the above results was understood,area classification based on the developnent intention of the farm households was presented. en-copyright= kn-copyright= en-aut-name=HoshinoSatoshi en-aut-sei=Hoshino en-aut-mei=Satoshi kn-aut-name=星野敏 kn-aut-sei=星野 kn-aut-mei=敏 aut-affil-num=1 ORCID= en-aut-name=IharaMitsuaki en-aut-sei=Ihara en-aut-mei=Mitsuaki kn-aut-name=井原満明 kn-aut-sei=井原 kn-aut-mei=満明 aut-affil-num=2 ORCID= en-aut-name=MeseMorio en-aut-sei=Mese en-aut-mei=Morio kn-aut-name=目瀬守男 kn-aut-sei=目瀬 kn-aut-mei=守男 aut-affil-num=3 ORCID= affil-num=1 en-affil= kn-affil=岡山大学 affil-num=2 en-affil= kn-affil=(株)地域計画研究所 affil-num=3 en-affil= kn-affil=岡山大学 en-keyword=rural development plan kn-keyword=rural development plan en-keyword=quantification theory kn-keyword=quantification theory en-keyword=questionnaire investitation kn-keyword=questionnaire investitation en-keyword=areal differentiation kn-keyword=areal differentiation END start-ver=1.4 cd-journal=joma no-vol=87 cd-vols= no-issue=1 article-no= start-page=195 end-page=203 dt-received= dt-revised= dt-accepted= dt-pub-year=1998 dt-pub=199802 dt-online= en-article= kn-article= en-subject= kn-subject= en-title=Consideration on Practical Procedure for the Evaluation Process Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process --Basic Study on District Suitability Classification (6)-- kn-title=AHPを用いた評価手法の手順に関する一考察--地区分級に関する基礎的研究（6）-- en-subtitle= kn-subtitle= en-abstract=本稿では、手順的な側面から、AHPを用いた地区分級の評価手法を考察し、デルファイ方式の2段階手順(全体手順)、等価値尺度化の手順、スケール値の修正手順などを新たに提案した。事例への適用過程で感じた手応え、若干の客観データ、アンケート調査などを総合的に勘案すると、ここで提案した手順は、細部の詰めが不十分な点もみられるが、おおむね適当であったと判断される。今後、地区分級は、地域診断手法という方向に発達すべきことを述べたが、本稿で示した評価手順は、このような診断手順に要請される多様な評価基準に柔軟に対応しうるものである。 kn-abstract=From both theoretical and substantiative points of viem, the author examined applicability of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluation process of District Suitability Classification (DSC), which is one of the land classification techniques for rural land-use plan. In this research, I so devised a concrete system of evaluation procedure with AHP and examined the validity of the procedure in those days. But the results was not published yet. In the evaluation process of AHP, such participatory operations as summarization of member's opinions, conversion of indicator values on the common value scale etc. are accompanied. Moreover, "quality" of such operations influences the evaluation results grealy. Therefore we cannot but say that significance of the procedure is quite important from practical point of view. This paper proposes a systematic procedure of DSC with AHP, and considers the availability of the procedure. At first I briefly summarize the development detailsof DSC technique and the theory of AHP. Next, I explain the procedure of DSC with AHP and the results of case study. In consideration of some objective data, simple questionnaire results to the participating members etc., we examine the practicability of the procedure. en-copyright= kn-copyright= en-aut-name=HoshinoSatoshi en-aut-sei=Hoshino en-aut-mei=Satoshi kn-aut-name=星野敏 kn-aut-sei=星野 kn-aut-mei=敏 aut-affil-num=1 ORCID= affil-num=1 en-affil= kn-affil=岡山大学 en-keyword=District Suitability Classification kn-keyword=District Suitability Classification en-keyword=Analytic Hierarchy Process kn-keyword=Analytic Hierarchy Process en-keyword=evaluation process kn-keyword=evaluation process en-keyword=participatory planning technique kn-keyword=participatory planning technique END start-ver=1.4 cd-journal=joma no-vol=78 cd-vols= no-issue=1 article-no= start-page=53 end-page=61 dt-received= dt-revised= dt-accepted= dt-pub-year=1991 dt-pub=1991 dt-online= en-article= kn-article= en-subject= kn-subject= en-title=Studies on Optimum Size and Optimum Farm Organization for Japanese Pears Farm kn-title=ナシ作経営の適正規模と適正品種・作型に関する研究 en-subtitle= kn-subtitle= en-abstract= kn-abstract=In this paper, we discussed the optimum farm size and optimum farm organization for pear growing. The long-term objective of farm business is to raise the residual net return to a full-time farm laborer working the longest time possible. The optimum farm size is determined by maximization of net return to one farm laborer, taking into consideration such external and internal factors as climates, prices, techinical devices, farm organization and others. In this paper we estimated the optimum farm sizes for pear growing in Togo town and Tohaku town in Tottori prefecture by the parametric linear programming model. The results are as follows: (1)The optimum pear-farm per laborer in Togo town is 33.7 ARES, whereas in Tohaku is 36.3 ARES. But the actual farm sizes are smaller than the optimums due to the farmers' strong preference to risk aversion, and due to improper land conditions, lack of capitals, insufficient labor market and other factors. (2)In case of Togo town, the optimum farm size per laborer is 14.0 ARES for "Nijuseiki pears" on slope land, 2.8 ARES for "Nijuseiki pears" in green house, 10.0 ARES for "Okusankiti," and 6.9 ARES for "Shinkou," while in Tohaku town the optimum is 12.7 ARES for "Nijuseiki pears" on flat land, 2.5 ARES for "Nijuseiki pears" in green house, 13.1 ARES for "Housui," and 8.0 ARES for "Sinkou. (3)The above results suggest the following for development and reformation of pear Farms in the studied areas. 1)The land consolidation is necessary in Togo town to economize the labor force and to Raise the optimum farm size. 2)For large pear farms in Tohaku town, growing "Housui" and "Sinkou" pears instead of "Nijuseiki" will help raise the net return. 3)In both areas ,obtaining enough labor forces during the busiest season is one of most Important factors to realize the optimum sized farming. en-copyright= kn-copyright= en-aut-name=TakeuchiMikio en-aut-sei=Takeuchi en-aut-mei=Mikio kn-aut-name=竹内幹雄 kn-aut-sei=竹内 kn-aut-mei=幹雄 aut-affil-num=1 ORCID= en-aut-name=HoshinoSatoshi en-aut-sei=Hoshino en-aut-mei=Satoshi kn-aut-name=星野敏 kn-aut-sei=星野 kn-aut-mei=敏 aut-affil-num=2 ORCID= en-aut-name=MeseMorio en-aut-sei=Mese en-aut-mei=Morio kn-aut-name=目瀬守男 kn-aut-sei=目瀬 kn-aut-mei=守男 aut-affil-num=3 ORCID= affil-num=1 en-affil= kn-affil=岡山大学 affil-num=2 en-affil= kn-affil=岡山大学 affil-num=3 en-affil= kn-affil=岡山大学 END