このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 61797
FullText URL
Author
Furumatsu, Takayuki Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital Kaken ID publons
Hiranaka, Takaaki Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital
Okazaki, Yuki Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital
Kintaka, Keisuke Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital
Kodama, Yuya Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital
Kamatsuki, Yusuke Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital
Ozaki, Toshifumi Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital Kaken ID publons researchmap
Abstract
Background
Medial meniscus (MM) posterior root repairs lead to favorable clinical outcomes in patients with MM posterior root tears (MMPRTs). However, there are few comparative studies in evaluating the superiority among several pullout repair techniques such as modified Mason–Allen suture, simple stitch, and concomitant posteromedial pullout repair. We hypothesized that an additional pullout suture at the MM posteromedial part would have clinical advantages in transtibial pullout repairs of the MMPRTs. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical usefulness among several types of pullout repair techniques in patients with MMPRTs.
Methods
Eighty-three patients who underwent arthroscopic pullout repairs of the MMPRTs were investigated. Patients were divided into three groups using different pullout repair techniques: a modified Mason–Allen suture using FasT-Fix all-inside meniscal repair device (F-MMA, n = 28), two simple stitches (TSS, n = 30), and TSS concomitant with posteromedial pullout repair using all-inside meniscal repair device (TSS-PM, n = 25). Postoperative clinical outcomes and semi-quantitative arthroscopic meniscal healing scores (0–10 points) were evaluated at second-look arthroscopies.
Results
No significant differences among the three groups were observed in patient demographics and preoperative clinical scores, except for preoperative Lysholm scores. At second-look arthroscopies, there were no significant differences among the three techniques in postoperative clinical outcomes and meniscal healing scores.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated that the TSS-PM pullout repair technique did not show better scores in postoperative clinical outcomes and meniscal healings compared with the F-MMA and TSS techniques. Our results suggest that the concomitant posteromedial pullout suture may have no clinical advantage in the conventional pullout repairs for the patients with MMPRTs.
Note
© 2020 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.This is the accepted manuscript version. The formal published version is available at [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2020.11.013] .
Published Date
2021-02-10
Publication Title
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Volume
volume27
Issue
issue1
Publisher
Elsevier B.V.
Start Page
181
End Page
189
ISSN
09492658
NCID
AA11052566
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© 2020 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
File Version
author
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2020.11.013
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Citation
Takayuki Furumatsu, Takaaki Hiranaka, Yuki Okazaki, Keisuke Kintaka, Yuya Kodama, Yusuke Kamatsuki, Toshifumi Ozaki, Medial meniscus posterior root repairs: A comparison among three surgical techniques in short-term clinical outcomes and arthroscopic meniscal healing scores, Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 2021, ISSN 0949-2658, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2020.11.013.
Open Access (Publisher)
non-OA
Open Archive (publisher)
Non-OpenArchive